PHEROS AND CO ASSAM PVT LTD v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
WP(C)/6564/2024 · 2025-01-06
Devashis Baruah
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21523 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21523 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010260912024
2025:GAU-AS:265
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6564/2024 PHEROS AND CO ASSAM PVT LTD A PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY REGD. UNDER COMPANIES ACT 1956, HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AND PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS SITUATED AT INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, BAMUNIMAIDAM, GUWAHATI-21, ASSAM, REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR SAMRISH SINGH VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE , DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6 2:THE DIRECTOR INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPARTMENT
ASSAM UDYOG BHAWAN BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI-21 3:THE ASSAM INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (AIIDC) INDUSTRIAL ESTATE
BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI - 781021 DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM 4:THE MANAGING DIRECTOR ASSAM INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Page No.# 2/3 (AIIDC)
INDUSTRIAL ESTATE
BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI - 781021 DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM 5:THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER (HR) ASSAM INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (AIIDC)
INDUSTRIAL ESTATE
BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI - 781021 DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSA
Advocate for the petitioner(s): Mr. J Sharma
Advocate for the respondent(s): Mr. S Chamaria, For respondent Nos.3 & 4
B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
ORDER 07.01.2025
Mr. J Sharma, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that taking into account the stand which has been taken in the affidavit and there being disputed questions of fact, the petitioner would not like to press
Page No.# 3/3 the instant writ petition and would rather file appropriate suit before the Civil Court of competent jurisdiction.
2. Taking into account the above, the writ petition stands closed.
3. Closure of the writ petition, however, shall not prejudice the writ petitioner in any civil proceedings so initiated.
4. Interim order passed earlier stands vacated.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant