Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2152 (UTT)

Trilok Singh v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME) GOVERNMENT OF UTTARAKHAND

CRLR/217/2018 · 2025-02-28

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:1442 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS CRLR/217/2018 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Ms. Gurbani Singh, learned counsel for the revisionist. 2. Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. Mr. Karmanya Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent. 4. The revision has yet not been admitted. 5. Learned counsel for both the parties submits that in fact the dispute is arising out of the matrimonial discord which now the parties have settled, and, as such there is no cause of action. 6. In view of the statement as given by the learned counsel for the parties, since the parties have settled their dispute,, the present criminal revision is dismissed as infructuous. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 28.02.2025 Parul 2025:UHC:1442