1 2025:CGHC:44091 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3607 of 2023 1 - Deenabandhu Tandi S/o Late Ramel Tandi, Aged About 58 Years Working As Labor Inspector, Currently Posted At Office Of Labor Officer District Jashpur, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Office Of Labor Commissioner, Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, Indravati Bhavan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Devanshi Chakraborty, Advocate on behalf of Mr. H.A.P.S. Bhatia, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey, G.A. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 Order on Board 29/08/2025 1. This petition is preferred against order dated 18.5.2023. 2. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- "10.1 That the Hon'ble High Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the transfer of the petitioner vide order dated 18.05.2023 (Ann. P-1) so far as it relates to the petitioner, and its consequences, if any, in the ends of justice. 10.2 That the Hon'ble High Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other alternative, additional writ in favour of the petitioner including the cost of the petition, and in the ends of justice." 3. Vide order dated 14.6.2023, the petitioner was granted stay and the impugned transfer order dated 18.5.2023 was stayed by this Court. 4. Considering the aforesaid aspect of the matter and considering the fact that on the strength of the aforesaid stay order, the petitioner is still continuing at his original place of posting, as such, by the afflux of time the said order, has lost its efficacy and as such the order dated 18.5.2023 is required to be quashed and accordingly the said order under challenge is hereby quashed. 3 5. However, liberty is granted to the respondent State authorities to pass appropriate orders in respect of transfer of the petitioner, in case exigency arises, without being influenced by this order. 6. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat