SMT. KUMKUM SINGH W/O SHRI DINESH SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/7501/2025 · 2025-06-11
Anand Sharma V J
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21518 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21518 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:23080] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7501/2025 Smt. Kumkum Singh W/o Shri Dinesh Singh, Aged About 35 Years, H.no. 13, Gali No. 13 Auliya Masjid, Sainik Enclave, Mohan Garden, Police Station Mohan Garden, Dwarika, New Delhi, Currently Lodged In District Jail, Dholpur. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yuvraj Samant, Advocate assisted by Ms. Neha Amola, Advocate and Mr. Tilak Verma, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, Public Prosecutor.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA (V.J)
Order 11/06/2025
1. This bail application has been filed by the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in respect of FIR No.05/2025 registered at Police Station Cyber, District Dholpur for the offences punishable under Sections 316(2), 318(4) 61(2), 338, 336(3) & 340(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and 66D of Information Technology Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the FIR, and no offence whatsoever has been committed by her. It is contended that the complainant himself was engaged in playing online game and had previously withdrawn profits earned through such online game.
3.
Learned counsel further submits that the accused-petitioner is a lady and was illegally arrested by the police authorities during
[2025:RJ-JP:23080] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7501/2025] night, which is evident from the CCTV footage. It is further submitted that the offences alleged against the petitioner are triable by Magistrate, and no recovery is to be effected from her. Moreover, custodial interrogation is not required in the present case. Trial is likely to take a considerably long time. Therefore, counsel for the accused-petitioner prayed for allowing the present bail application.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed this bail application.
5. Considered the submissions made at Bar.
6. Taking into consideration, the overall facts and circumstances of the case, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
7. Accordingly, this bail application is hereby allowed. The accused-petitioner Kusum Singh wife of Dinesh Singh shall be released on bail in pursuance of FIR No.05/2025 registered at Police Station Cyber, District Dholpur on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of the like amount. That apart, the accused-petitioner shall also follow the conditions as under:- (i) He shall not tamper with any evidence, nor would influence the witnesses in the case. (ii) He shall not leave the country without prior permission of the Court. (iii) He shall co-operate in the trial and shall attend each and every date of hearing in the trial, until and unless his presence is
[2025:RJ-JP:23080] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7501/2025] exempted by the trial Court.
8. In case of failure of observance of these conditions, a ground for cancellation of bail would arise. (Anand Sharma (V.J.)),J Tushar/270