Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21514 (GAU)

SAIDUL AHMED @ MD SAIDUL AHMED v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS

I.A.(Civil)/212/2025 · 2025-02-23

Lanusungkum Jamir

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010259782024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/212/2025 SAIDUL AHMED @ MD SAIDUL AHMED SON OF SAMSUDDIN AHMED, R/O- BHUYAN PATTY, A.J.B. ROAD, P.O.- HAIBORGAON, P.S. NAGAON SADAR, IN THE DISTRICT OF NAGAON, ASSAM, PIN- 782105. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006. 2:THE CHIEF ENGINEER WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT CHIEF ENGINEER WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT BASISTHA ASSAM WATER CENTRE GUWAHATI-29. 3:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MORIGAON WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT MORIGAON PIN- 782105. 4:THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER JAGIROAD WATER RESOURCES IN THE DISTRICT OF MARIGAON Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM PIN- 782410. 5:THE ACCOUNTS OFFICER MORIGAON WATER RESOURCES DIVISION MORIGAON PIN- 782105. 6:THE CHAIRMAN MINISTRY OF JAL SHAKTI DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES BRAHMAPUTRA BOARD BASIATHA ASSAM PIN 781029 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S S S RAHMAN, MR. M R SODIAL,MR S AHMED,MS S Z HAYAT,H. BHARALI Advocate for the Respondent : SC, WATER RESOURCE, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR ORDER Date : 24.02.2025 Heard Ms. S. Z. Hayat, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Ms. J. Gogoi, learned standing counsel, Water Resource Department for the respondent Nos. 1 to 5. By this application, the applicant who is the writ petitioner in WP(C)/4238/2023 is praying for impleadment of The Chairman, Ministry of Jal Shakti, Department of Water Resources, Brahmaputra Board, Basistha, Assam, PIN-781029 as party respondent No.6 in the WP(C)/4238/2023. The learned standing counsel Water Resource Department has no Page No.# 3/3 objections. This Court has also perused the cause shown in the present application and is satisfied and accordingly the prayer for impleadment is allowed. The I.A is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant