ASHOK VYANKATRAO SAWASE AND OTHERS v. ZILLA PARISHAD BEED THR C.E.O. AND OTHERS
WP/8375/2025 · 2025-07-11
Shri Manish Pitale, Shri Y G Khobragade
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21502 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21502 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 WP / 8375 / 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 929 WRIT PETITION NO. 8375 OF 2025 ASHOK VYANKATRAO SAWASE AND OTHERS VERSUS ZILLA PARISHAD BEED THR C.E.O. AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the petitioners : Mr. V.V. Bhavthankar AGP for the respondent – State : Mr. S.V. Hange ...
CORAM : MANISH PITALE &
Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ. DATE : 11 JULY 2025 PER COURT : In the writ petition itself, at paragraph 7, it is specificaly stated as follows :
“7. On 27/3/2-25 the petitioners filed suit ie RCS no 157/20225 in the Court of Civil Judge SD Majalgaon against respondents for permanent injunction restraining the respondents they should not construct road Mamla fata to Keshav Padule from their fields. The petitioners also filed temporary application for injunction wherein civil court granted status quo.”
2. We are of the opinion that the petitioners can very well pursue the said remedy before the civil Court and no case is made out for invoking writ jurisdiction of this Court. 2025:BHC-AUG:18055-DB
2 WP / 8375 / 2025
3. Writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to pursue the pending suit before the civil Court.
[ Y.G. KHOBRAGADE ] [ MANISH PITALE ] JUDGE JUDGE arp/