[2025:RJ-JP:38137] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9262/2025 Gopal Lal Vyas S/o Shri Heera Lal Vyas, Aged About 64 Years, R/o Village And Post Karoi, Tehsil And District Bhilwara ----Petitioner Versus 1. Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Rajasthan State Roadways Transport Corporation, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur 2. General Manager, Rajasthan State Roadways Transport Corporation, Jaipur 3. Financial Advisor, Rajasthan State Roadways Transport Corporation, Head Office, Jaipur 4. Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Roadways Transport Corporation, Rajsamand Depot, Rajsamand ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Pathak For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 18/09/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already filed a representation (Annexure-4) in the Office of respondent No.4- Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Roadways Transport Corporation, Rajsamand Depot, Rajsamand, but the same has not been decided as yet. He further submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if he is granted an opportunity to file a fresh representation for his grievances as narrated in the present writ petition before the respondent No.1- Chairman-cum- Managing Director, Rajasthan State Roadways Transport [2025:RJ-JP:38137] (2 of 2) [CW-9262/2025] Corporation, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur, with a direction to decide the same expeditiously and in a time bound manner. 2. Heard. 3. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before respondent No.1 within a period of four (04) weeks from today. Respondent No.1 is directed to decide the said representation within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of filing of such representation by passing a speaking order, strictly in accordance with law. 4. It is made clear that the aforesaid direction to decide the representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of the petitioner’s grievance. The same shall not be construed as an order to decide the representation in any particular manner. 5. Furthermore, it is needless to say that after adjudication of the representation, if any cause of action still survives, the petitioner would be at liberty to avail further remedies available under the law. 6. In view of the above, the present writ petition stands disposed of. 7. Other pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J DEEPA-1