Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010260462024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3754/2024 MUKTAR KHAN S/O SAHEB ALI R/O DEHAL PATH, BEHARBARI P.S. BASISTHA, DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM PERMANENT ADDRESS-PALHAJI, P.S. BARPETA SADAR DIST. BARPETA, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. A. MEDHI, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI ORDER 22.01.2025 Heard Ms. A. Medhi, learned counsel appearing for the accused petitioner as well as Mr. K. Baishya, learned Addl. P.P., Assam appearing for the State respondent. By filing this petition under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 the accused- petitioner, namely, Sri Muktar Khan, has prayed for grant of bail in connection with Basistha P.S. Case No.850/2024 under Sections 21(b) of NDPS Act,1985. The matter relates to recovery and seizure of 17.9 grams of heroin from the possession of the accused petitioner which falls under intermediate quantity. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused petitioner has been languishing in judicial custody for last 57 days since his arrest on 26.11.2024 and the contraband items recovered from his possession are intermediate quantity. Considering the length of detention, prayer for bail may be considered. Mr. K. Baishya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that though case diary is received without the FSL report, however, length of detention may be considered. In view of the submission of learned counsel for both the parties and considering the length of detention, this Court is of the view that further custodial interrogation of the accused-petitioner is not necessary in the interest of investigation of the case. Page No.# 3/3 Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.50,000/- with two suitable sureties of the like amount, to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Kamrup(M). The direction for bail is further subject to the conditions that the petitioner: (a) shall not leave the territorial jurisdiction of learned Special Judge, Kamrup(M) without prior written permission from him/her; (b) shall not hamper with the investigation, or tamper with the evidence of the case; (c) shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. In terms of the above, this bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant