MEENU RATHORE AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/12560/2020 · 2025-03-18
Saral Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21493 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21493 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:39729 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 12560 of 2020 Petitioner :- Meenu Rathore And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Yogesh Kumar Saxena Counsel for Respondent :- Bhanu Bhushan Jauhari,C.S.C. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. It appears that by efflux of time, no cause of action survives in the present petition and the writ petition has become infructuous. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. In case, cause of action survives in the writ petition, the petitioners may file a recall application within a period of two months to recall the said order. However, it is open to the petitioners to challenge the subsequent development as per law. Order Date :- 19.3.2025 Sattyarth Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad