1 2025:CGHC:24287 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4016 of 2018 • Deepak Kumar S/o Shri Amoli Ram, Aged About 28 Years R/o C/o Santosh Nirmalkar, Kasaridih, Fokat Para, Civil Line, Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. 491001 ... Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Law And Legislative Affairs, Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhavan, P.O. Rakhi, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. The District And Sessions Judge, Durg, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 3. The Selection Committee, The District And Sessions Court, Durg, Through The District And Sessions Judge, Durg, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 4. The Public Information Officer, District Court, Durg, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Ms. Devanshi Chakrawarti, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. H.A.P.S. Bhatia, Advocate For Respondent No.1/State : Ms. Shailja Shukla, Deputy Government Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 16/06/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- 10(i) That the Hon’ble High Court may most kindly be pleased to call the entire records of examination process including the note sheets relating to taking decision of giving up of the Written Test vide the amended advertisement dated 30.01.2018 (Ann. P- 2), answer-sheets of the petitioner and other such candidates who obtained equal marks as the petitioner i.e. 49.5 marks, in the ends of justice. Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI 2 10.(ii)That the Hon’ble High Court may most kindly be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari or of any other appropriate nature quashing the process as well as result and its consequences including the Select List and the Waiting List (Ann. P-3) for the post of Assistant Grade-3 relating to the advertisement dated 07.10.2016 (Ann. P-1) and the amended advertisement dated 30.01.2018 (Ann. P-2) as published by the respondents No. 2 & 3, in the ends of justice. 10.(iii) The Hon’ble High Court may also be kind enough to direct the respondent No. 2 & 3 to revalue the answer-sheet of skill test of the petitioner in the ends of justice. 10.(iv) That, it is prayed that Hon’ble High Court may kindly grant any other relief or/and alternative relief to the petitioner which is deemed proper, just and fit in the facts and circumstances of the case. 2. Ms. Devanshi Chakrawarti, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner pleads no instruction. 3. Considering the submission made by Ms. Devanshi Chakrawarti, the petition is dismissed. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti