Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21484 (CHH)

REKHRAJ SHARMA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/1790/2020 · 2025-07-17

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1790 of 2020 1 - Rekhraj Sharma S/o Babulal Sharma, Aged About 82 Years R/o House No. 04, Ward No. 03, Besides Saluja Saw Mill, Kawardha, Road, Bemetara Chhattisgarh, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Public Works, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Post And P S Mandir Hasaud, Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector And District Magistrate Bemetara Chhattisgarh, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh 3 - Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited, Through Its Managing Director, Vidyut Seva Bhawan, Dangania, Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Chhattisgarh State Power Transmission Company Limited, Through Its Managing Director, Vidyut Seva Bhawan, Dangania, Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Executive Engineer, Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited, Bemetara Chhattisgarh, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Krishna Tandon, Adv. on behalf of Mr. Aman Kesharwani, Adv. For State : Mr. Dashrath Prajapati, P.L. For Respondents No. 3 to 5 : Mr. Soumitra Kesharwani, Adv. on behalf of Mr. Apurv Goyal, Adv. Digitally signed by AJINKYA PANSARE Date: 2025.07.21 10:23:50 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order On Board 18-07-2025 1) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the pleading made by the respondents No. 3 to 5 in para-7 of their reply, grievance of petitioner has been redressed. He prays that this petition may be disposed of reserving liberty in favor of petitioner to revive his prayer if cause of action subsists. 2) No objection from other side. 3) Taking into consideration the submission made hereinabove, this petition stands disposed of at admission stage. However, petitioner would be at liberty to revive his prayer if cause of action subsists. Sd’/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE Ajinkya