\\\\ 'D IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMAR TUESDAY, THE F§FRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PEE,SENT: THE HONOURABLE SR! Jus§T!CE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PE"TION NO: 6220 OF 2025 Betwee n : 1-Arumugam Suresh Kumar, S/oo Arumugam, R/o 12/87, 77th Street,12th Sector, Kalainagar, Karunanic!rt Nagar, Chennai, Tamilnadu State.(A3) 2. Balasubramanyam Muttu Kuma.r, S/o Balasubrahmanayam, aged 30 years, R/o Pambal Nalla Thabi Teru, Saligram, Madyalagan Nagar,12- 1, Chennai, Tamilnadu State {A4-}-ll . \ Y .I.|Petitioners/A3 & A4 -',A.-REF) , The State Station House OfficerJ FjaFsipatnam Rural Police Station Rep. by public Prosecutor, High Court ofArti±hira pradesh At Amarava{i ... Respondent Petition under Section 439(1) cEf-Cr.P.C and Sec 483(1) of BNSS is filed, praying that in the circumstanc}esl stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal PetitI-On, the High CcjLi<r{~may be Pleased tO modify the Order passed by the learned I Additional-'E}istFict & Sessions Judge -Special Judge for Trial of Offences under NDP-S``'r:A`ct : Visakhapatnam in Crl.M.P. No. 966/2025 in Cr. No.114/2024 dated 08.04.2025 considering the situation of the petitioners as {lthe petitioner'sJ\'`St}i:bali execute a bond for Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) wi#®j+I--a;fife surety each for like sum to the satisfaction of the court of Addit_i®na! Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Narsipatnam" instead of " on his execution Of Personal bond for Rs.50,000/- each with two sureties for like sum Sac?:a-",I \ Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri VogriELSaHta Durga Rao Anantha Counsel for the Respondent: Assidsft.ainft Public Prosecutor The court made the following ORESE`ginbl:, |i+. L ` \ _-_ .. _` J*')mfst`}.i-`_`_-. +`-__,:rS -_ / / APHCO10303782025 lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA 'PRADESH AT AMARAVATl (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE [3327] PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITIONNO: 6220/2025 Betwee n : 1.ARUMUGAM SURESH KUMAR, R/O 12/87, 77TH STREET, 12TH SECTOR, KALAINAGAR, KARUNANIDH NAGAR, CHENNAI, TAMILNADU STATE. 2 pB:AAA:AABSSAUULBB R%NHMASLXL¥AAAyMATh AM£UFTETDUT E3R u:yuEMAAsRRASi I G RAR:§ MADYALAGAN NAGAR, 12-1, CHENNAI, TAMILNADU STATE ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1.THE STATE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NARSIPATNAM RURAL POLICE STATION REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl H.R,ESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the petitioner/accused(s): 1.VENKATA DURGA RAO ANANTHA Counsel for the Respondent/complaI-nant: 1. The Court made the followirig: ORDER.-- This CrimI'nal Petiti6n, under section 483(1)(b) of the B.N.S.S., has been filed by the peti-tioners/A3 & A4, seeking modjfI'Cation of the conditions I'n the bail order vide _ --+--- .'- --, 2 Crl.M.P.No.966/2025 dated 08.04.2025 on the file learned I Additional District & Sessions Judge-Gum-Special Judge for trial of offences under the NDPS Act, Visakhapatnam and permit the petitioners to execute personal bonds for Rs.20,000/- each with one surety instead of Rs.50,000/-with two sureties. 2. lt is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioners that despite grant of bail by the I Additional District & Sessions Judge-Gum-Special Judge.for trial of Offences under the NDPS Act, Visakhapatnam in CrI.M.P.No.966/2025 dated 08.04.2025, petitioners/A3 and A4 could not furnish sureties for Rs.50,000/- each with two sureties to the satisfaction of Court of Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Narsipatnam. He further contends that the petitioners belong to poor family and the petitioners are the only persons to look after their family members by doing coolie work. It is further submitted that more than two and half month time elapsed after granting bail to the petitioners and the petitioners family members could not comply with the order by furnishing sur.eties. ln the said facts of the case, petitioners request to consider their case on humanitarian grounds. 3. ln view of the aforesaid facts and Circumstances Of the Case, the condition imposed by the learned I Addit'IOnal District & ±-- a._.t¢ -tt ., -g,, _ ___ T 3 SessI'OnS Judge-Gum--special Judge for trial of Offences under the NDPS Act, Visakhapatnam in crI.M.P.No.966/2025, dated 08.04.2025 directing the petitioners/A3 and A4 to execute Personal bond for Rs.50,000/-. (Rupees fifty thousand only) each with two sureties for like such each, is modified to the extent of directing the petitI|OnerS/A3 and A4 to execute personal bond for Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand only) each with one surety for like sum each. The rest of the conditI-OnS imposed I'n crl.M.P.No.966/2025, dated o8.04.2025, shall rema['n Llnaltered. 4. Accordingly, the criminal petition I-S allowed. _.-\ 2 SD/- N. Im€is ±{i®is}PYll -ASSISTAN ._^¢^! -a.` ` ,,. ` CTloN OFFICER KSR ='...`=`-.*1L..-..,.,.```. 1. The Additional Judicial M?vgjs[f?t`e of First Class, Narsipatnam. 2. The I Additional District & Si.e.ud3t;fens Judge -Special Judge for Trial of Offences under NDPS Act.:i:,f:¥i^$9khaPatnam. 3. The Superintendent, Central Jail, visakhapatnam. 4. The State Station House -.Qffl€'`fLR'r, `Narsipatnam Rural Police Station. 5. One CC to SRl. VENKATA..-'D',URGA RAO ANANTHA Advocate [opu6] 6| One spare copy I,.`-``!.i;.;. -i.Jf*:i..; v1 HIGH COURT SRK, J DATED:01/07/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.6220 of 2025 ALLOWED 8 4 JuLZOffi L# . ..;i