IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH M/s Kapurthala Bus Transporters Regd. The State of Punjab CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE M Present : Mr. Raj Kaushik Mr. R. S. Pandher DEEPAK SIBAL, J 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of wit State Transport Commissioner, Punjab, Chandigarh notice dated 17.09.2025 2. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is 3. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction on the legal notice petitioner, by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, preferably within order. 4. Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to petitioner and if the decision is not to th liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. 30.03.2026 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable Sr. No. 139 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Kapurthala Bus Transporters Regd. Versus State of Punjab and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Raj Kaushik, Advocate, for the petitioner R. S. Pandher, Addl. A. G., Punjab. * * * * * DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to Transport Commissioner, Punjab, Chandigarh 2025 (Annexure P-7) submitted on behalf of Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. legal notice dated 17.09.2025 (Annexure P , by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to , preferably within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. (DEEPAK SIBAL (LAPITA Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-7223-2026 Date of decision : 30.03.2026 .… Petitioner ..... Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL LAPITA BANERJI petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be h a direction to respondent No. 2- to take a decision on the legal on behalf of the petitioner. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, respondent No. 2 to take a decision P-7) submitted on behalf of the , by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to from the date of receipt of a copy of this Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the e satisfaction of the petitioner, it would be at DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2026.04.01 17:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document