HARINDER CHAND THAKUR AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS
CWP/21256/2025 · 2026-01-06
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2147 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2147 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH,
SHIMLA
CWP No. 21256/2025
Decided on: 06.01.2026
Harinder Chand Thakur & Anr.
…Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. & Anr.
.…Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioners: Mr. Sameer Thakur, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Rajat Choudhary, Assistant
Advocate General.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J.
Notice. Mr. Rajat Choudhary, learned Assistant Advocate General, accept notice on behalf of the respondents.
2.
Petitioners are seeking applicability of Jatinder Singh & Ors. Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.2
3.
Admittedly, the petitioners have invoked extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India without even preferring any representation to the competent authority for the redressal of their grievances raised in the writ petition.
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 CWP No. 5695/2024 decided on 10.09.2025
2
4.
Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be preferring their respective representations within two weeks from today. In case, such representations are so preferred, the competent authority shall consider and decide the same, in accordance with law, within further period of six weeks. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioners.
The instant petition is disposed of in above terms. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Judge 06th January, 2026(rohit)