Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21468 (KAR)

M/S. RICHARDSONS FACE HOSPITAL PVT. LTD., v. SRI. STEPHEN T. V.

MFA/2372/2024 · 2025-06-26

C M Poonacha

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23558 MFA No. 2372 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.2372 OF 2024 (CPC) BETWEEN: M/S. RICHARDSONS FACE HOSPITAL PVT. LTD., A REGISTERED COMPANY HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT ARK, NO. 76, SAI ENCLAVE, KALKERE, HORAMAVU, BANGALORE – 560 043 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, SRI R.RICHARDSON ASIR …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SATYA NARAYANA REDDY, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI. STEPHEN T. V. S/O SRI LATE M.E. VARGESE, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 203 ANANDABAIRAVI APARTMENT, HENNUR MAIN ROAD, K.K HALLI, BANGALORE – 560 084. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. S. K. VENKATACHALAPTHI, ADVOCATE FOR C/R) THIS MFA IS FILED U/O.43 RULE 1(r) OF THE CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DT.21.02.2024 PASSED ON IA NO.1 AND 2 IN O.S.NO.2114/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE VII ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU, ALLOWING IA NO.1 FILED U/O.39 RULE 1 AND 2 OF CPC, DISMISSING IA NO.2 FILED U/O.39 RULE 4 OF CPC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by NIRMALA DEVI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23558 MFA No. 2372 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a Memo for withdrawal, which reads as under: “MEMO The Appellant in the above case submits that both the parties in the above suit have settled their respective claim in O.S.No.2114/2022, before the VII Additional Senior Civil Judge, Bangalore by filing the compromise petition and accordingly, the said suit is disposed of in terms of Compromise Petition on 27/05/2024 and as such the above appeal doesn’t survive for consideration. Hence, this Memo to dismiss the above appeal as withdrawn in the interest of Justice.” In view of the same, the above appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE DR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 2