Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21465 (AP)

CHINTAGUNTA APPA RAO v. The Joint Collector

WA/298/2010 · 2025-01-28

Dhiraj Singh Thakur, Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATl^J TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY FIVE ^ PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CHIEF JUSTIC^^ AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT APPEAL NO: 298 OF 2010 Writ Appeal under Clause 1^ the Letters Patent preferred against the order dated 19.3.2010 in WP.No.25413 of 2009 on the file of the High Court Between: Chintagunta Appa Rao, S/o Late C.Karnam Naidu Faiprice Ship Dealer Boddavalasa (V) Pogiri Panchayat Rajam(l\/I) Srikakulam District. ...Appellant AND 1. The Joint Collector, Srikakulam District. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Palakonda Revenue Division Palakondaa, Srikakulam District. 3. The Tahsildar, Rajam(M) Rajam, Srikakulam District. ...Respondents I.A. NO: 1 OF 2010(WAMP. NO: 683^F 2010) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to allow the petitioner/Appellant herein to distribute the Essential Commodities to the respective card holders under public distribution system by suspending the operation of the order passed by the Tahsildar, Rajam the 3'" respondent herein in Rc.No.348/09/B dated 3.10.2009 confirmed in WP.No.25413/2009 dated 19.3.2010 by this Hon'ble Court. as I.A. NO: 2 OF 2010(WAMP. NO: 1291 OF 2010f^ Between: 1. The Joint Collector, Srikakulam District. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Palakonda Revenue Division Palakondaa, Srikakulam District. 3. The Tahsildar, Rajam(M) Rajam, Srikakulam District. r ...Petitioners/Respondents— AND Chintagunta Appa Rao, S/o Late C.Karnam Naidu Faiprice Ship Dealer Boddavalasa (V) Pogiri Panchayat Rajam(M) Srikakulam District. ...Respondent/Petitioner _ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in^the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleasedjacate the interim orders granted in WAMP No. 683/2010 in WA No. 298/2010 dt. 05-5-2010. ^ Counsel for the Appellant: SRI RAMA RAO MAVIDI _ Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following order: APHC010303982010 IN THh HIGH COURT OF ANiDHIFfA PRADESH AT AfKfii\RAV/iTI Sr.No:-23 [3483] r WRIT APPEAL MO: 298 of 2010 Chintagunta Appa Rao ...Appellant Vs. The Joint Collector and others ...Respondents **>lr5l:****** Advocate for appellant Advocate for respondents ; Sri Rama Rao Mavidi ; Learned Government Pleader for Civil Supplies, learned Government Pleader for Erdcvvments. CORAMI .THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SIMGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEI\<5TtLAPATI : 28lth January 2025 DATE PC : Sri Rama Rao Mavidi, learned counsel for the appellant, states that the matter has been rendered infructuoua, 2. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is disposed of as infructuous. No costs. Pending miscellaneous applications , if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- M.RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// To, SECTION OFFICER 1. The Joint Collector, Srikakulam District. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Palakonda Revenue Division, Palakondaa, Srikakulam District. 3. The Tahsildar, Rajam(M) Rajam, Srikakulam District^ 4. One CC to Sri Rama Rao Mavidi, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to GP for Civil Supplies, High Court of Andhra Pradesl^[OUT] 6. Two CD Copies RAM HIGH COURT DATED:28/01/2025 10 FEB 2025 ^ . Current aecuon . ORDER Co/f WA.No.298 of 2010 DISPOSING OF THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS