MANISH KUMAR AGARWAL @ MANISH KUMAR AGARWALA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
AB/3196/2024 · 2025-01-28
Malasri Nandi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21462 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21462 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010259362024
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/3196/2024 MANISH KUMAR AGARWAL @ MANISH KUMAR AGARWALA S/O SRI BISHNU KUMAR AGARWALR/O REHABARI, P.O. REHABARI P.S. PALTAN BAZAR, GUWAHATI-781008 DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM PH. NO. 7002053547 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. G AGARWAL, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI ORDER 29.01.2025
Heard Mr. G. Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. N. Das, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State This petition under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, is filed for granting the privilege of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner, namely, Mr. Manish Kumar Agarwal @ Mr. Manish Kumar Agarwala apprehending his arrest in connection with Dokmoka P.S. Case No. 25/2024, (GR 272/2024), registered u/s 61(2)b/ 305/317(2)/ 317(5)/ 3(5) of BNS, 2023 R/W Section 53(1) a of the Assam Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. The Case diary, as called for, is placed before the Court. It may be mentioned that by order, dated 16.12.2024, this Court granted the privilege of interim pre-arrest bail to the petitioner. Ms. N. Das, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, submits that the case diary shows that the petitioner has appeared before the investigating officer and got his statement recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. as per the interim pre arrest bail granted earlier. There is no adverse report against the petitioner from the I.O. Therefore, the interim pre-arrest bail granted vide order, dated 16.12.2024 is hereby made absolute, subject to the following conditions- (i) That the petitioner shall co-operate with investigation as and when required; (ii) That the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or
Page No.# 3/3 to any police officer; and (iii) That the petitioner shall not hamper or tamper with the investigation in any manner. Return the case diary. This disposes of the anticipatory bail application.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant