Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2146 (RAJ)

KALPESH KUMAR PATEL S/O SHRI VALCHANDRA PATEL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/166/2025 · 2025-04-07

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:15524] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 166/2025 Kalpesh Kumar Patel S/o Shri Valchandra Patel, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Mahida, Post Nayagaon, District Udaipur Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical Health Services, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Director, Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. State Institute Of Health And Family Welfare (Sihfw), Jhalana Institutional Area, Jaipur Through Its Director. 4. Rajasthan State Allied And Health Care Council, Through Secretary, C-7-A, Sultan House, Jaisingh Highway, Banipark, Jaipur. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 454/2025 1. Mousam Sevak S/o Shri Rajendra Kumar Sevak, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Ward No. 8, Jain Basti Mukam Post Vassi, Bassi, District Dungarpur. 2. Hitesh Kumar Nai S/o Shri Lav Ji Nai, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village Jhalap, Tehsil Simalwara District Dungarpur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical Health Services, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Director, Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. State Institute Of Health And Family Welfare (Sihfw), Jhalana Institutional Area, Jaipur Through Its Director. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Laxmi Kant Malpura [2025:RJ-JP:15524] (2 of 2) [CW-166/2025] For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC with Ms. Anjali Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 07/04/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that final list has been issued and candidature of the petitioners, inspite of having more marks than cutoff, is not included. It is submitted that respondents are time and again declining to consider the candidature of the petitioners, on the ground that candidature of the petitioners is under process. Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that present petitions can be disposed of with direction that within a period of three weeks, the final order qua the grievance of the petitioners be passed. In light the above noted submissions, present petitions are disposed of with the direction to the respondents that within period of three weeks, the grievance of the petitioners be considered and be adjudicated by way of a speaking order. If any stay order is operative, same will stand operative till final disposal of the applications of the petitioners, before the respondents. Present petitions are disposed of, in above terms. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /43 & 83