Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:2442 WP No. 8975 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 8975 OF 2020 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
THE PRINCIPAL, S.C.NANDIMATH LAW COLLEGE, BVV SANGHA CAMPUS, BAGALKOT-587 101. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.S.VENKATANARAYANA., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. MADHUKAR DESHPANDE., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SRI SUBHAS S/O HANAMANTAPPA BUDIHAL, PAMPA NAGAR, WARD NO.1, GANGAVATI, KOPPAL-583 227. 2. THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATVIE SOCIETIES, DC OFFICE COMPLEX, NAVANAGAR, BAGALKOT-587 103. 3. S.C.NANDIMATH LAE COLLEGE, ALUMNI ASSOCIATION, A SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF KARNATAKA ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION ACT, 1960, AND HAVING ITS OFFICE AT BVV SNAGHA CAMPUS, BAGALKOT-587 101. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 4. KARNATAKA INFORMATION COMMISSION, M.S.BUILDING, 3RD FLOOR,
Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:2442 WP No. 8975 of 2020
3RD STAGE, NEAR VIDHANA SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISIONER. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MANJUNATHA RAYAPPA., ADVOCATE FOR R2;
SRI. ARUN A GADAG., ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SMT. VIDYA GOWDA., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. G.B.SHARATH GOWDA., ADVOCATE;
R3-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
Sri.B.S.Venkatanarayana., counsel on behalf of Sri.Madhukar M.Deshpande., for the petitioner, Sri.Manjunatha Rayappa., AGA for respondent No.2 and Smt.Vidya Gowda., counsel on behalf of Sri.G.B.Sharath Gowda., for respondent No.4 have appeared in person. Sri.Arun A.Gadag., counsel for respondent No.1 has appeared through video conferencing. 2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Certiorari to set aside the Appeal in Case No.KIC 12772 APL 2018 pending before the respondent No.4 vide Annexure-G and proceedings in Case No.KIC 12772 APL 2018 before the
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:2442 WP No. 8975 of 2020
Karnataka Information Commission, Bangalore vide Annexures- A1 to A11. 3. Counsel for the respective parties urged several contentions. Heard the arguments and perused the Writ papers with care. 4. Counsel Sri.Arun A.Gadag., submits that the second appeal that has been filed by the first respondent before the Commission will be withdrawn within two weeks from today. Counsel therefore, submits that an appropriate order may be passed. The oral submission made by counsel for respondent No.1 is placed on record. 5.
The grievance of the petitioner is met with because of the undertaking for the withdrawal of the second appeal. In the result, the proceedings before the fourth respondent are hereby quashed. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, a direction is issued to the second respondent to dispose of the first appeal at the earliest. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 29