WASIM AKRAM AND ANR. v. STATE TH.TOURISM DEPTT.AND ORS.
SWP/1259/2013 · 2025-03-04
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2145 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2145 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case:- SWP No. 1259/2013 IA No. 1827/2013
Wasim Akram and Anr. …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs
State of J&K and Ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Rajesh Thappa, AAG
Coram:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER (04.03.2025)
01. Record reveals that notice was issued in the instant petition on 31.05.2013 and the instant petition has come up before this Court after twelve years and during this intervening period, the petitioner has not made any effort for listing of the petition.
02. Today also, when the instant petition was taken up, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, which clearly shows that the petitioner has lost interest to prosecute this petition any further.
03. In the aforesaid backdrop, the instant petition is dismissed for non- prosecution, along with the connected application(s).
04. Interim directions, if any, shall stand vacated.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU
04.03.2025
Riya
S. No. 24