Page No.# 1/3 GAHC030008082025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/224/2025 M/s GSR Ventures Pvt. Ltd Through its authorized signatory K. Mohammed Rafi S/o K.C. Imam Saheb, R/o Mallapur, Telengana VERSUS State of Mizoram and 5 Ors. Through the Commissioner and Secretary, Govt. of Mizoram, Public Works Department, Upper Khatla, Aizawl, Mizoram 2:The Engineer-in-Chief 3:The Chief Executive Officer 4:The Chief Engineer (Roads) 5:The Superintending Engineer 6:The Executive Enginee Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms. Snigdha Bhattacharjee Advocate for the Respondent : Addl. AG/GA, Mizoram Linked Case : Arb.A./4/2025 Page No.# 2/3 M/s GSR Ventures Private Limited Through its signatory K. Mohammed Rafi S/o K.C. Imam Saheb R/o Mallapur Telengana VERSUS The State of Mizoram and 5 Ors. Through the Commissioner and Secretary Government of Mizoram Public Works Department Upper Khatla Aizawl Mizoram 2:The Engineer-in-Chief Public Works Department Tuikhuahtlang Aizawl Mizoram 3:The Chief Executive Officer Mizoram Rural Roads Development Agency Tuikhuahtlang Aizawl Mizoram 4:The Chief Engineer (Roads) Public Works Department Mizoram Tuikhuahtlang Aizawl Mizoram 5:The Superintending Engineer Public Works Department Mizoram Lunglei Circle Lunglei Mizoram 6:The Executive Engineer Public Works Department Mizoram Saiha Division Saiha Page No.# 3/3 Mizoram Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms. Snigdha Bhattacharjee Advocate for the Respondent : B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA ORDER 19.01.2026 Heard Ms. K. Laltanpuii, learned counsel for the applicant, who submits that there is a delay of 5 days in filing the appeal against the impugned Judgment & Award dated 22.08.2025, passed by the District Judge, Aizawl in Arbitration Case No. 4/2022, arising out of Arbitration Proceeding No. 5/2022. Mrs. Vanneihsiami, learned Advocate General submits that she has no objection to the delay of 5 days being condoned. On considering the grounds for the delay in filing the appeal, this Court finds that sufficient cause for the delay has been made out. Accordingly, the delay of 5 days is condoned. I.A. is accordingly allowed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant