MUSARA JAGANNADHA REDDY v. The State of Andhra Pradesh.,
WP/15192/2025 · 2025-06-24
Harinath N
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21445 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21445 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010302952025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) ar Q WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF J TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 15192 OF 2025 Between:
1. Sri Musara Jagannadha Reddy, S/o. Sreeramulu Reddy, aged 45 years. Cultivation.
2. Smt. Musara Manjula, W/o. Jagannada Reddy, aged 38 years. Cultivation. Both are residents of D.NO. 3- 146- 14- 14- 7- 4, Rama Rao Colony, Madanapalli Town, Annamayya District ...Petitioners AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Department of Home, Secretariat Velagapudi, Guntur District.
2. The Superintendent of Police, Annamayya District Rayachoty
3. The Circle Inspector of Police, Rayachoty Rural Police Rayachoti, Annamayya District.
4. The Station House Officer, Chinnamandem Police Station, Annamayya District. Secretary, Station, ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ,
order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of a writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of
/ India declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 4 herein, in not providing police aid/protection to the property an extent of Ac 4.53 cents in Sy No 174 and Ac 6.21 cents in Sy No 173-1 situated in Kalibanda Village, Chinnamandem Mandal, Annamayya District, in pursuance of the ad-interim injunction granted vide orders, dated 27.08.2024 made in I.A.No. 653 of 2024 in O.S. No.212 of 2024 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Rayachoty by considering petitioner's representation dated 16.06.2025, as being arbitrary, illegal, and violative of the Fundamental Rights of the petitioners herein under Articles 21 and 300 A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent nos. 2 to 4 to forthwith grant police aid/protection to the subject property of the petitioners herein, of an extent of Ac 4.53 cents in Sy No 174 and Ac 6.21 cents in Sy No 173-1 situated in Kalibanda Village, Chinnamandem Mandal, Annamayya District, in pursuance of the ad-interim injunction granted vide orders, dated 27.08.2024 made in I.A.No. 653 of 2024 in O.S. No. 212 of 2024 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge at Rayachoty. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 herein, to forthwith consider petitioners’ representation dated 16.06.2025 and provide police protection by taking all necessary action as deem fit and proper. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI PAPUDIPPU SASHIDAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order:
I-' ■ 1 HN, J W.P.No.l5192_2025 APHC010302952025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 15192/2025 Between: ...PETITIONER(S) Musara Jagannadha Reddy and Others AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.PAPUDIPPU SASHIDAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR home
W.P.No.l5192_2025 The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners were granted an injunction by the competent Court in O.S.No.212 of 2024 vide orders dated 27.08.2024.
Inspite of the injunction in favor of the petitioners, third parties are attempting to interfere with their possession. In that regard, the petitioners submitted a representation 16.06.2023; however, the 4**" respondent has not acted upon the representation. 2. Considering the submission, there shall be a direction to the 4 respondent to consider the representation dated 16.06.2025 of the petitioner in accordance with Section 173(3) of the BNSS and also in the light of the order of injunction passed by the Court. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed off. There shall be no order as to costs. 1. on th As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shaH stand closed. Sd/- N. NAGAMMA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, Department of Home, State of Andhra
1. The Principal Secretary Pradesh, Secretariat Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Annamayya District Rayachoty Circle Inspector of Police, Rayachoty Rural Police Station
3. The Rayachoti, Annamayya District. 4. The Station House Officer, Chinnamandem Police Station, Annamayya District. 5. OneCCto
6. Two CCs to GP for Home High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT]
7. Three CD Copies Sri. Papudippu Sashidar Reddy Advocate [OPUC]
HIGH COURT DATED:25/06/2025
ORDER WP NO. 15192 OF 2025 DISPOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS