M/S. SRI MANIKANTA CONSTRUCTIONS v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/15585/2024 · 2025-08-17
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21441 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21441 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010302612024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] MONDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 15585/2024 Between:
1. M/S. SRI MANIKANTA CONSTRUCTIONS, REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER SRI. GANTA KOTESWARA RAO, S/O. GANTA SATYA NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O. 1- 73, GALAYAGUDEM, DENDULURU(M), ELURU DISTRICT-534450 . ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (MAUD),
SECRETARIAT,VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT
2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT,VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE HOUSING CORPORATION ELURU DISTRICT AT ELURU. 4. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, A.P. STATE HOUSING CORPORATION LTD (APSHCL) HEAD OFFICE, NIRMAAN BHAVAN, PLOT NO.11
2
AND 12 AUTO NAGAR,VIJAYAWADA-520007. 5. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, A.P. STATE HOUSING CORPORATION LTD (APSHCL) VIJAYAWADA. 6. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEERV AND QC, A.P. STATE HOUSING CORPORATION LTD (APSHCL) HEAD OFFICE, VIJAYAWADA. 7. THE DISTRICT HEAD, A.P STATE HOUSING CORPORATION ELURU DISTRICT, ELURU
8. THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, A.P STATE HOUSING CORPORATION LTD,
KAIKALURU SUB-DIVISION, ELURU DISTRICT. 9. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, A.P STATE HOUSING CORPORATION LTD, KAIKALURU MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. 10. THE DIVISION HEAD, A.P STATE HOUSING CORPORATION ELURU DIVISION, ELURU. 11. THE PAY AND ACCOUNTS OFFICER, WORK ACCOUNTS, ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. JAMI MADHAVI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. KALYAN CHAKRAVARTHY R
2. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP
3. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following:
3
ORAL ORDER:
Heard Ms. Jami Madhavi, learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Sri P. Soma Raju, learned Counsel representing Sri Kalyan Chakravarthy, learned Standing Counsel for Respondent Nos.3 to 10 and Sri P. Rajesh Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Finance and Planning. 2.
The present Writ Petition is filed seeking the following prayer:
“pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not paying the approved bills for an amount of Rs.6,47,29,437/- (in words Six Crore Forty Seven Lakh Twenty Nine Thousand Four Hundred and Thirty Seven Rupees only) to the petitioner in respect of Agreement vide No:19/CE/APSHCL/Kaikaluru Levelling/ ELR/ 2023-24, Dt.27.06.2023, in relation to the execution of work - for Filling of Low Lying Lands (House Site Lavout ID No.064801LA 04506, Plot No1 to 1205 total extent of 30.50 Acrs in RS No. 3, 237 to 247, 248/1B, 248/2, 261 to 264, 265/3, 265/4 and 266-12A in Kaikaluru Village and Mandal of Eluru District, Est value: Rs.661.00 lakhs, in spite of approval of final bills, as illegal, arbitrary, malafidy, against to the principles of natural justice, contrary to law and in violation of Article 14, 21 and 19(g) of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to pay the approved bill amount Rs.6,47,29,437/- (in words Six Crore Forty Seven Lakh Twenty Nine Thousand Four Hundred and Thirty Seven Rupees only) for the said work to the petitioner forthwith in the interest of justice and to pass”
3. Sri P. Soma Raju, learned Counsel representing Sri Kalyan Chakravarthy, learned Standing Counsel for Respondent Nos.3 to 10 submits that payments have been made and no cause survives. He has also submitted
4
the Written Instructions furnished by the General Manager (Admin), APSHCL, dated 14.08.2025. Copy of it is supplied to the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the same is taken on record. 4. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, on Instructions, submits that the payments have been made in this Writ Petition and no further consideration is necessary. 5. Having recorded the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. 6.
Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. _________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:18.08.2025 SCH
5
79
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
WRIT PETITION NO.15585 OF 2024 18.08.2025
SCH