1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2494 of 2023 1 - Ujjwal Anand Jain, S/o A.K. Jain, Aged About 29 Years, R/o H.No. 27 Ward No.45, Shrishti Colony Kaurinbhatha Rajnandgaon, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Prem Shankar Sahu, S/o Jhaggar Ram Sahu, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Nagar Kohra, Rajnandgaon, Chichola, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Manoj Kumar Yadav, S/o Jagarnath Yadav, Aged About 28 Years, R/o H.N. 1039 Gh, Behind Police Station Kunkuri, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. ...Petitioners versus 1 - Union Of India Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Skill Development Entrepreneurship 2nd Floor, Annexe Building Shivaji Building Shivaji Stadium Shaheed Bhagat Singh Marg, Connaught Place, New Delhi, New Delhi 110001. 2 - Directorate General Of Training Ministry Of Skill Development And Entrepreneurship, Shram Shakti Bhawan, Rafi Marg, New Delhi 110001. 3 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Skill Development, Technical Education And Employment, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Directorate Of Technical Education Through The Director, Hod Building, Block 3, 3rd And 4th Floor Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 5 - Directorate Employment And Training (Training Side) Through Director Employment And Training, Indrawati Bhawan, Block-4, 1st Floor Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar Raipur Chhattisgarh. 6 - Controller Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Manoj Kumar Yadav, Advocate For UOI/ Respondent No. 1 : Mr. Ramakant Mishra, Dy. Solicitor General For State/ Respondent : Mr. Ratan Pusty, G.A. For Respondent No.6. : Mr. Avinash Singh, Advocate D.B. : Hon'ble Shri Justic e Sanjay S. Agrawal & Hon’ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari Judgement on Board Per Sanjay S. Agrawal, J. 16.01.2025 1. As per the request of the counsel for the Petitioners, the instant matter is de-linked from WPS No.1881/2022, and other connected matters. 2. Counsel for the Petitioners prays for withdrawal of this petition. 3. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. /- Sd/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal) Judge Sd/- (Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge Arpan