Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21438 (BOM)

NAVNATH LAXMAN JAGTAP v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

BA/1221/2025 · 2025-09-29

Shri Sanjay A Deshmukh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

38 BA NO. 1221 OF 2025.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 38 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1221 OF 2025 Navnath Laxman Jagtap VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra and Another ... Mr. Zodge Dilip B, Advocate for Applicant Mr. K. K. Naik, APP for Respondent/State Ms. Karishma Sarin, Advocate for Respondent No.2 (Appointed) .… CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 29.09.2025 PER COURT :- 1. Heard learned advocates for both sides. 2. When this Court expresses disinclination to allow the application, upon instructions, learned advocate for the applicant seeks leave to withdraw the application. 3. Leave granted. The application is disposed of as withdrawn. 4. It is submitted that the evidence of some witnesses has been recorded. However, the Trial Court is directed to conclude the trial as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a year from today. 5. The fees of appointed advocate Ms. Karishma Sarin shall be paid through the High Court Legal Services Sub-Committee, Aurangabad as per rules and Schedule. [ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] HRJadhav 1 of 1