Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21435 (AP)

Kakumanu Srinivas, v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/20066/2020 · 2025-09-01

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010302382020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 20066/2020 Between: 1. KAKUMANU SRINIVAS,, S/O. K.KOTESHWARA RAO AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, RIO, FLAT NO. 403, 7/2, BRUNDAVAN RESIDENCY CHANDRA MOULI NAGAR, GUNTUR-7 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY IT'S PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME DEPARTMENT) SECRETARIAT, AT AMARAVATHI 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR URBAN,GUNTUR CITY, GUNTUR. 3. THE DY COMMISSIONR OF POLICE, GUNTUR DIVISION, GUNTUR. 4. THE ASST SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR CITY, 5. THE DY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, GUNTUR 6. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, P.S.LALAPET, GUNTUR 7. GANGISETTI RAMA KRISHNA, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC- PVT EMPLOYEE, R/O 13-6-233, KRISHNA NAGAR, OPP. NARAYANA OLAMPIAD SCHOOL, GUNTUR-2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B SIVA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondent no 6 insisting the petitioner to settle the matter of civil in nature with the respondent no 7 by threatening abusing with filthy language the petitioner when there is civil suit vide 0.S.No.694 of 2020 on the file of learned I Addl Junior Civil Judge Court Complex Guntur is pending against the respondent no 7 consequently direct not to foist any false case against the petitioner in future by entertainig false complaint lodged by respondent no 7” 2 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 3. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 4. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:02.09.2025 Asr 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.20066 of 2020 Dt.02.09.2025 Asr