PUNLAL SHIVLAL DHANNAWAT v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
CA/5306/2022 · 2025-03-04
Shri Sandipkumar C More
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21432 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21432 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
(1) 930 CA-5306.2022.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 930 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5306 OF 2022 IN FAST/20341/2021 PUNLAL SHIVLAL DHANNAWAT VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS … Mr. D.M. Pingle, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Rajdeep R. Raut, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 and 2. ...
CORAM :
SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.
DATED :
4 MARCH 2025.
ORDER:-
1. Heard rival submissions.
2. The applicant is seeking condonation of delay of 2065 days, which appears to be caused due to his poor financial condition. The learned Counsel for respondent Acquiring Body despite appearance, remained absent.
3. Considering the statutory right of the applicant and for the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed and the delay of 2065 days in this application stands condoned subject to cost of Rs. 3,500/- to be deposited with the Registry of this Court for utilization of High Court Dispensary and also subject to condition that the applicant shall not claim any interest and statutory benefits for the period of aforesaid delay.
(2) 930 CA-5306.2022.odt
4. The appeal be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.
5. The application is accordingly disposed of.
(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) VD_Dhirde