[2025:RJ-JP:6544] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16042/2024 Sohan Lal S/o Late Pemaram, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Regran Mohalla, Bus Stand Maroth, P.s. Maroth, District Didwana (Raj.) At Present Tenant, Near Maliyo Ka Shamshan, Harijan Basti, Bhinasar, P.s. Ganganahar, Bikaner (Presently Confined In Central Jail Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 43/2025 Balram @ Bhalaram S/o Dharmaram, R/o Village Chadwas, Police Station Chappar, District Churu. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Devanshu Sharma Mr. Aayush Agarwal For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 14/02/2025 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.119/2024 registered at Police Station Dargah, District Ajmer (Rajasthan) for the offences punishable unders Sections 457 & 380 of IPC. [2025:RJ-JP:6544] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-16042/2024] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. Counsel submits that person who was found in possession of stolen articles has been granted benefit of bail by learned trial Court. Counsel further submits that charge-sheet has been filed in this matter. Petitioners are in custody since their date of arrest and trial will take considerable time. Further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. She submits that petitioners are habitual offender and 20 other cases have been registered against the petitioner Sohan Lal and 16 other cases have been registered against the petitioner Balram @ Bhalaram. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, as also the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; charge-sheet has been filed in this matter; period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow these bail applications. 6. These bail applications are accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners (1) Sohan Lal S/o Late Pemaram & (2) Balram @ Bhalaram S/o Dharmaram shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) [2025:RJ-JP:6544] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-16042/2024] together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and they shall mark their presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station. 8. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to them by this Court. 9. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner. In case the petitioner fails to mark their presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /374-375