Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21425 (RAJ)

SUNIL BABANI S/O LATE SHRI GHANSHYAMDAS BANANI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/7472/2025 · 2025-07-29

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:28635] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7472/2025 Sunil Babani S/o Late Shri Ghanshyamdas Banani, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Wz43, 3Rd Floor, Dayalsar Road, Police Station Bindapur, Uttam Nagar, Block C-South-West, New Delhi - 110059, Presently Tenant At Karni Colony, 8-C, Path Number 07, Police Station Murlipura, District Jaipur (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail, Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gurvindra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 29/07/2025 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0136/2025 registered at Police Station-Shivaji Park, District-Alwar for offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4) of BNS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the allegation against the petitioner pertains to the cheating of ornaments valued at Rs.1,54,500/-. The ornaments mentioned in the FIR, have been recovered from the present petitioner. The petitioner is behind the Bars since 29.05.2025 and charge-sheet [2025:RJ-JP:28635] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7472/2025] has been filed. No previous history of criminal cases is against him. The case is exclusively triable by the Judicial Magistrate. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Sunil Babani S/o Late Shri Ghanshyamdas Banani shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J sunita/185