IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHA PRADESH, SHIMLA CWPOA No. : 6443 of 2019 Decided on : 08.04.2025 Sh. Joginder Singh. .…Petitioner. Versus The State of H.P. and Ors. …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Bonit Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pratush Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral) In compliance to order dated 20.12.2024, the compliance affidavit has been filed today in the Court and is taken on record. According to the affidavit and documents annexed therewith, the claim of the petitioner has been accepted and he has been ordered to be regularized w.e.f. 24.01.2002 on completion of ten years part time service on notional basis. He has further been 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 Neutral Citation No. ( 2025:HHC:9745 ) held entitled for consequential/pensionary benefits w.e.f. 29.11.2012. 2. Confronted with this, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions submits that the claim of the petitioner stands satisfied and nothing survives in the petition. 3. The petition is, accordingly, disposed of, having been rendered infructuous. 4. However, it is expected from the respondents that the consequential benefits w.e.f. 29.11.2012, shall be made available to the petitioner within eight weeks from today. 5. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Satyen Vaidya) 8th April, 2025 Judge (sushma)