Gurija Adinayarayana, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/14062/2019 · 2025-08-21
B V L N Chakravarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21420 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21420 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010303332019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 14062/2019
Between:
1. GURIJA ADINAYARAYANA,, S/O LATE APPANNA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC - FARMER, R/O. R.
GADABAVALASA VILLAGE, NEMALAM PANCHAYAT, THERLAM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT AT VIZIANAGARAM. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, THERLAM POLICE STATION, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 4. GURIJA NARAYANA RAO, S/O. LATE APPANNA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O. R. GADABAVALASA VILLAGE, NEMALAM PANCHAYAT, THERLAM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 5. VIJJI RUDRAVEENA, S/O LATE CHINNA RAO, AGED NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, R/O. SHANTINAGAR, PAYAKAPURAM VILLAGE, PAYAKAPURAM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 2
6. SURIKESI POLA RAO, S/O SURYA RAO, AGED ABOUOT 28 YEARS, R/O. DIGUVA STREET, DIGUVA STREET VILLAGE, SANTHAPURITA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 7. SRI PRASAD, S/O AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, OCC - ASSISTANT SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THERLAM POLICE STATION, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the impugned action of the 3rd respondent in registering the crime against the unofficial respondents 4 to 6 vide FIR No. 116/2019, dt.
03.08.2019 under Sections 324, 34 .IPC instead of registering the crime under appropriate sections of law without verifying the factual aspects and the gravity of the offence committed by the unofficial respondents 4 to 6 and not investigating the matter properly and the action of the unofficial respondent No. 7 in threatening the petitioner by phone to come to the Police Station and to withdraw the case before the 3I'd respondent-Police which was registered against the unofficial respondents 4 to 6 is as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, violative of fundamental rights enshrined under the Constitution and consequently direct the 3rd respondent-Police to register a crime against the unofficial respondents 4 to 6 under appropriate sections of law and to investigate the matter properly, and pass
3 IA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent-Police to register a crime against the unofficial respondents 4 to 6 under appropriate sections of law and to investigate the matter properly by giving protection to the lives and property of the petitioner and his family in the hands of the unofficial respondents 4 to 6, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and pass
IA NO: 2 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 7th respondent not to interfere and threaten the petitioner to withdraw the case registered vide FIR No. 116/2019, dt. 03.08.2019 against the unofficial respondents 4 to 6 for their illegal and unlawful acts, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. RAJESH MATCHA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
GP FOR HOME (AP)
4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 14062 of 2019 The Court made the following Order: Sri Rajesh Matcha, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition, by stating that the cause in the present Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State is in attendance. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 22.08.2025 PSA
5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 14062 of 2019
Date: 22.08.2025 PSA