Syed Atiidul Khadar Jeelani, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/15374/2024 · 2025-09-10
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21419 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21419 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010302782024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 15374/2024 Between:
1. SYED ATIIDUL KHADAR JEELANI,, S/O.LATE SYED JAFAR AHAMED JEELANI, MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS. SENIOR CITIZEN, R/O.5TH LANE, KODANDA RAMAIAH NAGAR, ETHIRAJA ROAD COLONY, NEAR CHUTTUGUNTA, GUNTUR CITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH,
SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI,GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR URBAN, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NAGARAMPALEM POLICE STATION, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. HABIBULLA SHAIK Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 15374 of 2024
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…pleased to issue a Writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not investigating and not filing charge sheet in Crime No.324/2016 on the file of 3rd respondent police station is illegal, irregular and violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also contrary to the provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure and consequently direct the respondents to complete the investigation and file charge sheet against the accused persons named therein in accordance with law and pass..…”
2. Heard Sri Habibulla Shaik, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the grievance of the petitioner is that police are not filing charge sheet in Crime No.324 of 2016 on the file of the 3rd respondent Police Station, till this date. Learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that a direction may be given to the respondent-police to conclude the investigation.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders.
5. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Police are directed to conclude the investigation and file a report
3
according to law as expeditiously as possible within a period of two (2) months from the date of receipt of copy of this Order, if not already filed by this date. No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 11.09.2025. UPS
4
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.15374 of 2024
Dated.11.09.2025
UPS
124