Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21414 (RAJ)

ANKIT S/O SOHANLAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/7460/2025 · 2025-08-28

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:34388] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7460/2025 Ankit S/o Sohanlal, R/o Raypur, Police Station Tatarpur, District Khairthal-Tijara. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Kishangarhbas). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manjeet Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 28/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 254/2025 registered at Police Station Mundawar, District Khairthal-Tijara for the offences under Sections 309(6) and 311 of BNS and Section 3/25 of Arms Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the recovery of stolen money was made on the basis of the joint information furnished under proviso to Section 23(2) of BSA and there is no recovery of any gun or pistol efected from the instance of the petitioner. The recovery of fire arm was effected from child in conflict with law. The charge-sheet against the petitioner has already been submitted, the accused- [2025:RJ-JP:34388] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7460/2025] petitioner is in custody since long and trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused- petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. It is not desirable to express anything on the merits of hte case. Considering the fact that charge-sheet has already been submitted and the petitioner is in custody since long and trial of the case may take considerable time, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Ankit S/o Sohanlal, in connection with FIR No. 254/2025 registered at Police Station Mundawar, District Khairthal-Tijara, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The accused-petitioner is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned police station. The SHO of the concerned police station is directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused-petitioner and shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner on the same day to the concerned Trial Court without any delay. In case of any breach to the above condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application [2025:RJ-JP:34388] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7460/2025] against the petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/76