Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010256702024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6447/2024 SANJAY KUMAR CHAUHAN S/O- RAJENDRA CHAUHAN, R/O- VILLAGE BELBARI, NO. 1, P.O.- MAILOO, DISTRICT WEST KARBI ANGLONG, PIN- 782446. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 9 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, ELEMENTARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06. 2:MISSION DIRECTOR SARBA SIKSHA ABHIJANM ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI-19. 3:KARBI ANGLONG AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL DIPHU (DEPARTMENT OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION) THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DISTRICT- KARBI ANGLONG PIN- 782460. 4:EXECUTIVE MEMBER KARBI ANGLONG AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL I/C EDUCATION DIPHU PIN- 782460. Page No.# 2/3 5:INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS KARBI ANGLONG DIPHU PIN- 782460. 6:DISTRICT PRIMARY EDUCATION OFFICER KARBI ANGLONG AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL WEST KARBI ANGLONG HAMREN PIN -782486. 7:DISTRICT MISSION CO-ORDINATOR SSA KARBI ANGLONG AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL DIPHU PIN- 782460. 8:DISTRICT MISSION COORDINATOR SAMAGRA SIKSHA WEST KARBI ANGLONG PIN- 782460. 9:THE SCHOOL MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT AND MEMBER SECRETARY NO. 2 NAWAIBILL EGS SCHOOL NOW AMALGAMATED TO SANKARBASTI HINDI M.E. SCHOOL NO. 3 NAWAILIL P.O.- LAMSAKHANG PIN- 782446. 10:MOTILAL CHAUHAN ASSISTANT TEACHER SANKARBASTI HINDI M.E. SCHOOL NO. 3 NAWAIBIL P.O.- LAMSAKHANG PIN- 782446 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P MAHANTA, C SARMA,V KHAKHALARY Advocate for the Respondent : SC, ELEM. EDU, MR N ISLAM(R-10),MR K BHUYAN (R-10),MR. M U E BHUYAN(R-10),SC, SSA,SC, K A A C Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER 17.09.2025 Heard Ms. V. Khakhalary, learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner. Also heard Mr. K. Bhuyan, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 10, Ms. B. Deka, learned Standing Counsel, Elementary Education, and Ms. H. Terangpi, learned Standing Counsel, KAAC. Ms. V. Khakhalary, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the petitioner has received the reliefs as sought for in the instant writ proceedings, she has received instructions not to press the instant writ petition. In view of the aforesaid endorsement made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed on being infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant