\ ■ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 15009 OF 2025 Between: 1. Jada Vasavi, W/o Kalyan Chakravathy, Aged about 40 years, R/o Flat No. 32, Gayatri Nagar, Bank Colony, Hayathi Nagar, Rangareddy District 2. Namana Suguna Ratnam, w/o Murali Krishna, aged about 39 years, R/o Plot No. 32, Gayatri Nagar, Bank Colony, Hayathi Nagar, Rangareddy District 3. Namana Murali Krishna, S/o Sambasiva Rao, aged about 46 years, R/o Plot No. 32, Gayatri Nagar, Bank Colony, Hayathi Nagar, Rangareddy District ...Petitioners AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Principal Secretary, Home Department Secretariat, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Bapatia District. 3. The Station House Officer, Bapatia Rural Police Station Bapatia District ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in calling the petitioners to police station without following due process of law and without having any valid reasons is illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of the articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to harass the petitioner by calling him to the police station and not to take any coercive steps. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to harrass the petitionera by calling them to the police station and not to take coercive steps, pending the disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner; M/s S LAKSHMI PRAMEELA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: any / APHC010302692025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY ,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 15009/2025 Between: Jada Vasavi and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner{S): 1.S LAKSHMI PRAMEELA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GPFOR HOME The Court made the following: ...RESPONDENT(S) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.15009 OF 2025 ORDER: 1. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners the siblings of Accused No.1 and the civil disputes are pending relating to the ancestral property between the petitioners and their deceased’s father. It is submitted that the deceased passed away by consuming some poison. It is also submitted that the deceased was aged about 70 years and also not stabled mentally. 2. It is also further submitted, a crime is registered vide Crime No.73 of 2025 for the alleged offence under Section 108 read with 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) against the petitioners also. The learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that the Accused No.2 was arrested on 19.06.2025. It is submitted that on account of family disputes over the ancestral property and on account of emotional outburst, the deceased was consumed poison and passed away. It is further submits that the petitioners are residents of Hyderabad and there they are working and they have absolutely no role in commission of alleged offence. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the State. 4. The police issued Section 179 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) notice calling upon the petitioners to appear before them are t on 21.06.2025. As seen from the notice it was issued on 19.06.2025, but it was served to the petitioner on today i.e., 20.06.2025. 5. Considering the submissions, there shall be a direction to the Investigating Officer/3'^'^ respondent to conduct investigation without taking any coercive steps against the petitioners. The 3'^'’ respondent shall give notice in advance to the petitioners granting them atleast a week time for appearance if their presence is required for investigation. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed off at the admission stage. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- B. CHITTI JOSEPH ASSISTANT REGISTER //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Bapatia District. 3. The Station House Officer, Bapatia Rural Police Station Bapatia District. 4. One CC to M/s S Lakshmi Prameela, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 6. Two CD Copies RAM ^IGH COURT GATED:20/06/2025 ORDER ’^P-No. 15009 of 2025