- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:4587 WP No. 29272 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 29272 OF 2019 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: CIVIL CORE PROJECTS (INDIA) PVT. LTD., A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT 2013, 10TH CROSS, MUTHARAYASWAMY LAYOUT, SUNKADAKATTE, BANGALORE - 560 091. REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, MR. DEVARAJA CHANDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, SON OF MR. CHANDRAPPA. …PETITIONER (ABSENT) AND: BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LTD., A GOVERNMENT OF INDIA UNDERTAKING, BEING A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT BHEL HOUSE, SIRI FORT, NEW DELHI - 110 049. REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE MR. A.K.PANDEY. AND HAVING ITS BRANCH OFFICE AT: FSIP, INDUSTRIAL AREA, JAGDISHPUR, AMETHI - 227 817. …RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:4587 WP No. 29272 of 2019 THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER The name of the petitioner is called out thrice in the open Court. The petitioner is not represented. The petitioner is absent. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 28.01.2025, on that day, counsel Sri.Kashyap N.Naik., was permitted to retire from the case and office was directed to print the name of the petitioner in the cause list and the petition was ordered to be listed on 30.01.2025. The petition was listed on 30.01.2025, on that day, the name of the petitioner was not printed correctly. Hence, office was directed to pint the name of the petitioner correctly and it was ordered to be listed on 31.01.2025. The petition is listed today by printing the name of the petitioner in the cause list. As already noted above, though the name of the petitioner is called out thrice in the open Court, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner is absent. It has neither engaged the services of an - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:4587 WP No. 29272 of 2019 advocate nor conducted the case as a party in person. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 4