Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Suresh Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and another
CMP(T) No.462 of 2025 in Ex. Petition No.289 of 2024
19.09.2025 Present Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents-State.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
While placing on record communication dated 18.09.2025, issued under the signatures of Regional Manager, Himachal Road Transport Corporation, Dharamshala, Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned counsel representing respondent No.2 states that sum of Rs. 1,45,138/- stands paid to the petitioner vide cheque No.46727 dated 18.9.2025 and as such, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present application.
Having perused the aforesaid communication, which is taken on record, there appears to be merit in the contention of
learned counsel representing respondent No.2.
In view of the above, the present application is
disposed of as having rendered infructuous. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate Court of law qua the surviving grievance, if any. (Sandeep Sharma) Judge September 19, 2025 (shankar)