CHENTHIL SUYAMBULINGAM @ SENTHIL v. THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP. BY
CRL OP(MD)/13451/2025 · 2025-10-13
S Srimathy
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 214030 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 214030 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13451 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 13.10.2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CRL OP(MD). No.13451 of 2025 Chenthil Suyambulingam @ Senthil ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Colachel, Kanyakumari District. (Crime No.19 of 2025)
... Respondent
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Arun Ramnath For Respondent : Mr.S.S.Manoj
Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For Intervenor : Mr.C.S.Lenin PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.19 of 2025 on the file of the Respondent Police. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13451 of 2025
ORDER : The Court made the following order :-
The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A), 406, 294(b) of IPC and 4 of TNPHW Act and 4 of DP Act, in Crime No.19 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant gave the complaint that the petitioner is and his family members are harassing for dowry and caused cruelty. Hence, the apprehension of arrest. Hence, a case has been registered as against the petitioner. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he has not committed any offence. He seeks this Court to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the offences committed by the petitioner are serious in nature. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13451 of 2025
5. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court referred the matter to Mediation and Conciliation Centre. However, the mediation has not concluded and the parties have expressed their views that mediation is not necessary. 6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner at this stage.
7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.
13.10.2025 TMG
TO 1.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Colachel, Kanyakumari District. 2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13451 of 2025 S.SRIMATHY, J. TMG
ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13451 of 2025 Date : 13.10.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis