Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21400 (KAR)

S C VEERABHADRAPPA v. M MANGILALJAIN

RSA/334/2015 · 2025-01-28

T G Shivashankare Gowda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:3774 RSA No. 334 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 334 OF 2015 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: 1. S.C. VEERABHADRAPPA, S/O LATE S. CHANNAVEERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, 2. DR. S.C. VIJAYKUMAR S/O LATE S. CHANNAVEERAPPA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, 3. S.M. SRIDHAR, S/O LATE MAHANANDI, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS 4. S.M. SHASHIDHARA S/O LATE MAHANANDI AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF V.P. EXTENSION, CHITRADURGA - 577 501. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. JAYAPRAKASH R.V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. M. MANGILALJAIN S/O. MISSRIMALJAIN AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS READYMADE GARMENTS BUSINESS, Digitally signed by MALA K N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:3774 RSA No. 334 of 2015 R/O. ASSAR MOHALLA CHITRADURGA - 577 501. 2. S.C. CHANDRASHEKAR S/O LATE S. CHANNAVEERAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/O V.P. EXTENSION, CHITRADURGA - 577 501. …RESPONDENTS (R2 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.10.2014 PASSED IN RA.NO.187/2004 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL.DISRICT SESSIONS JUDGE, CHITRADURGA, DISPOSING THE REGULAR APPEAL AND FILED AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28.01.1999 PASSED IN OS.NO.271/1994 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DVN.) CHITRADURGA. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel appearing for the appellants files a memo dated 07.01.2025 seeking withdrawal of the appeal. 2. Memo dated 07.01.2025 reports the death of appellant No.2 on 18.11.2020, appellant No.3 on 24.09.2019 and appellant No.4 on 21.06.2019. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:3774 RSA No. 334 of 2015 3. Though it is reported that appellant Nos.2 to 4 are dead, their legal representatives have not come on record. Hence, the appeal as against appellant Nos.2 to 4 stands abated. 4. The said memo is placed on record. 5. Appellant No.1 seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal. He is permitted to withdraw the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending I.As. are disposed as a consequence. SD/- (T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA) JUDGE SJK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17 CT: BHK