[2025:RJ-JP:28552] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7445/2025 1. Lekhraj S/o Shri Ramsahai, R/o Nagla Meghsingh, Police Station Sadar Bayana, District Bharatpur. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail, Bayana). 2. Tejsingh S/o Shri Ramsahai, R/o Nagla Meghsingh, Police Station Sadar Bayana, District Bharatpur. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail, Bayana). 3. Lokendra S/o Shri Kishansingh, R/o Nagla Meghsingh, Police Station Sadar Bayana, District Bharatpur. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail, Bayana). 4. Karansingh S/o Shri Badansingh, R/o Nagla Meghsingh, Police Station Sadar Bayana, District Bharatpur. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail, Bayana). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Lalit Gautam Mr. Rajeev Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Mukesh Kumar Saini HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 29/07/2025 1. The petitioners have preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.92/2025 registered at Police Station-Sadar Bayana, District-Bharatpur for offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 74, 352 and 303(2) of BNS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that for the same incident, cross case has been lodged by the [2025:RJ-JP:28552] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7445/2025] petitioner's side also in which petitioner's side also have suffered from the injuries. In support of his contentions, they have filed the copy of the cross case. Petitioners are behind the bars since 25.05.2025. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, hence, the bail application of the petitioners may be allowed. 4. On the contrary learned counsel for the complainant as well as learned Public Prosecutor have vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that in the present incident injured- Seema has suffered the grievous injury. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners-Lekhraj S/o Shri Ramsahai, Tejsingh S/o Shri Ramsahai, Lokendra S/o Shri Kishansingh and Karansingh S/o Shri Badansingh shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/182