IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.12946 of 2025 Decided on: 11.08.2025 _________________________________________________________________ Ravinder Singh . ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Anr. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Arun Kaushal, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Y.P.S.Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. ________________________________________________________________ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Y.P.S.Dhaulta, learend Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. With consent of learned counsel for the parties, matter is heard at this stage. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner has preferred representation Annexure P-3; Petitioner would be content if his representation is considered 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - and decided by the respondents, keeping in view the law laid down in Dev Raj and Ors Vs. Stae of H.P. & Anr2. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to this prayer. 3. Having regard to above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, in light of aforesaid decision, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The decision so arrived at, shall be communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge August 11, 2025 R.Atal 2 CWP No. 7688 of 2023 decided on 30.04.2025