- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:12787 WP No. 8287 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 8287 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. D.R.AMBIKA W/O SRI B.G.RAJAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/AT DODDERI CHELLURU POST HONNALI TALUK DAVANAGERE DISTRICT – 577 217. …PETITIONER (BY SRI H.T.NATARAJA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE MANAGER M/S. CANARA BANK CHILUR BRANCH, GROUND FLOOR SREEKANTHA NILAYA, MAIN ROAD CHILUR, DAVANAGERE - 577 230. 2. THE CHIEF MANAGER M/S. CANARA BANK, ASSET RECOVERY MANAGEMENT BRANCH CIRCLE OFFICE BUILDING UDUPI - 576 104. 3. THE AUTHORISE OFFICERS M/S. CANARA BANK ASSET RECOVERY MANAGEMENT BRANCH S.R.D.BUILDING HEAD OFFICE ANNEX Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:12787 WP No. 8287 of 2025 (MANIPAL), UDUPI - 576 104. 4. SRI D.G.RAJAPPA S/O LATE D.G.BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/AT DODDERI CHELLURU POST HONNALI TALUK DAVANAGERE DISTRICT – 577 217. 5. SRI D.G.SURESH S/O LATE D.G.BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT DODDERI CHELLURU POST HONNALI TALUK DAVANAGERE DISTRICT – 577 217. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI K.V.LOKESH, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDING THE SALE OF SCHEDULE PROPERTY MADE UNDER THE E-AUCTION NOTICE DATED 13.02.2025 VIDE REFERENCE NO. ARM/7280/SALENOTICE/830/2024-25, AND ANOTHER REF. NO. ARM/7280/SALENOTICE/905/2024-25, DATED 05.03.2025, ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.2 AND 3 AS PER ANNEXURE F AND G. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Heard Sri H.T.Nagaraj, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri K.V.Lokesh, learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:12787 WP No. 8287 of 2025 2. Sri K.V.Lokesh, learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3 submits that this Court in terms of the order dated 21.03.2025 had permitted respondent Nos.1 to 3 – bank to conduct sale but restrained from issuing the sale certificate or the sale confirmation to the auction purchaser. He would further submit that the sale infact had been conducted but has been cancelled. Therefore, the petition is rendered infructuous. 3. In the light of the aforesaid submission, nothing further survives for consideration in the petition and therefore, the petition is disposed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE NVJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27 CT:SS