Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21381 (RAJ)

NEERAJ S/O NUTAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/7405/2025 · 2025-07-17

Pramil Kumar Mathur

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:26672] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7405/2025 1. Neeraj S/o Nutan, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Jhalatala, Police Station Halena, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan ( Presently Languishing In Sub Jail Bayana, District Bharatpur) 2. Banwari S/o Nutan, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Jhalatala, Police Station Halena, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan ( Presently Languishing In Sub Jail Bayana, District Bharatpur) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jai Kishan Yogi Mr. Yenu Satyan Mr. Jeetendra Kumar Yogi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 17/07/2025 1. The petitioners have preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.89/2025 registered at Police Station-Halena, District-Bharatpur for the offence under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 74, 351(2) and 351(3) of BNS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the complainant is neighbour of the present petitioners and there is previous criminal litigation also pending. He further submits that [2025:RJ-JP:26672] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7405/2025] for the same incident, petitioners have also lodged an FIR. He submits that the alleged injury caused to the injured Rajni and Komal are simple in nature. Petitioners are behind the bars since 21.05.2025. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, hence the bail application of the petitioners may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners-Neeraj S/o Nutan and Banwari S/o Nutan shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/141