Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21377 (CHH)

RISHI KUMAR SHARMA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/2593/2025 · 2025-05-21

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:22285 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2593 of 2025 1 - Rishi Kumar Sharma S/o Gambhir Lal Sharma Aged About 43 Years Posted At Samiti-In-Charge, Manohara, Registration No. 210, R/o Kirwai, Post Damakheda, District Balodabazar- Bhatapara Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Food, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Mantralaya New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Up-Ayukt Chhattisgarh Rajya Sahkari Vipadan Sangh Maryadit Balodabazar, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara Chhattisgarh 3 - Jila Vipdan Adhikari Zila Sahkari Samiti Balodabazar, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara Chhattisgarh 4 - The Collector (Food Department) Balodabazar, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara Chhattisgarh 5 - Nodal Officer/ Chief Executive Officer Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, Balodabazar, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara Chhattisgarh ARPAN SRIVASTAVA Digitally signed by ARPAN SRIVASTAVA Date: 2025.05.22 16:40:27 +0530 2 6 - Food Officer Balodabazar, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara Chhattisgarh 7 - District Cooperative Central Bank Branch Simga, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara Chhattisgarh 8 - Deputy Registrar Cooperative Society, District Balodabazar- Bhatapara Chhattisgarh 9 - Cooperative Inspector Development Block Simga, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara Chhattisgarh 10 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Under Chief Secretary, Food Nagrik Apurty And Upbhokta Sanrakshan Vibhag, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nassimuddin Ansari, Advocate along with Riyazuddin Sheikh, Advocate For State For Respondents : : Mr. Atanu Ghosh, Dy. G.A. Ms. M. Asha, Advocate SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order On Board 22.05 .2025 1. In pursuant to the earlier order dated 20.05.2025 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this wherein, the Court directed the State Counsel to seek instruction. 2. Learned State counsel, on instructions, submits that the direction has been issued to withdraw the F.I.R., and the same has accordingly been withdrawn. 3 3. Since the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed, accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Arpan