Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21373 (RAJ)

ROOP SINGH S/O SH MOHANLAL DINANAK v. M/S VIKAS ELECTRICALS

CRES/214/2025 · 2025-07-02

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:24268] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 214/2025 in S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 2766/2015 Roop Singh S/o Sh Mohanlal Dinanak, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Poonam Colony, Gali No. 1, Station, Kota Police Station Railway Colony, Kota. ----Petitioner Versus 1. M/s Vikas Electricals, P. Sk Gupta Karyalay Behind Natraj Cinema, Bhimganjmandi, Kota. 2. The Union Of India, Through General Manager, Railway Charch Gate, Mumbai Vide Order 26-08-2004 The Union Of India Through General Manager (Kota Division) West Mp Jabalpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Carn Bhatnagar For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 02/07/2025 An application bearing No. 1214/2025 has been filed by the applicant under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 73 days for filing restoration application. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant and for the reasons mentioned in the application, this Court deems just and proper to condone the delay in filing restoration application. Accordingly, application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay stands allowed. [2025:RJ-JP:24268] (2 of 2) [CRES-214/2025] The restoration application has been filed by the appellant/applicant for restoration of the S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.2766/2015 which has been dismissed. Having considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant/appellant and for the reasons mentioned in the restoration application, the same is allowed subject to payment of cost of Rs. 2000/- with the Rajasthan High Court Munshi Sangh Jaipur Bench. The applicant shall submit the receipt of the payment with the Registry. On submitting the receipt of the payment, the appeal is ordered to be restored at its original number and position. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ANIL SHARMA /106