1 2025:CGHC:13885 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPL No. 57 of 2020 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Water Resources Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur Chhattisgarh. (The Petitioner No. 1 Was Not A Party Before The Learned Labour Court But Has Been Impleaded As Petitioner No. 1 In The Instant Petition As The Proper Course Is To Implead The State Government Through The Secretary Of The Concerned Department) 2. Executive Engineer, Hasdeo Canal Water Management Division, Janjgir District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.........(Second Party No. 1) 3. Sub Divisional Officer, Akaltara Branch, Canal Sub Division No. 6, Pamgarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh...............(Second Party No. 2) ... Petitioners/State Versus • Sitaram Patel S/o Panchuram Patel, Aged About 57 Years Ex- Time Keeper, R/o Village And Post Dhardei, Tahsil Pamgarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh................(First Party) ... Respondent For Petitioners/State : Mr. Pramod Shrivastava, Deputy Government Advocate For Respondent : Mr. K.P.S. Gandhi, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 22/03/2025 1. The petitioners/State have filed this petition seeking the following reliefs:- “10.i The Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records, pertaining to Award dated 11/10/2019 in Case No. 05/I.D. Act/2018/Reference. Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI 2 10.ii The Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue appropriate writ/writs, direction/directions, order/orders, holding that the impugned Award dated 11/10/2019 in Case No. 05/I.D. Act/2018/Reference is bad in law, arbitrary, therefore it may kindly be set aside/quashed. 10.iii Cost of the petition be allowed. 10.iv Any other relief, which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. Mr. K.P.S. Gandhi, learned counsel for the respondent would submit that award passed by the learned Court below has already been complied with and respondent has got retired from service, thus, this petition has become infructuous. 3. Mr. Pramod Shrivastava, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners/State would endorse the submission made by Mr. K.P.S. Gandhi. 4. Taking into consideration the above stated facts, the petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti