Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21366 (CHH)

BABULAL v. SUNDERLAL

ACQA/147/2021 · 2025-07-13

Shri Sanjay Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:32728 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ACQA No. 147 of 2021 Babulal S/o Manohar Aged About 51 Years R/o Village Lakhram, Police Station, Ratanpur Civil And Revenue Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ... Appellant versus 1 - Sunderlal s/o Gangaram Aged About 45 Years 2 - Ramsnehi S/o Asharam Aged About 35 Years 3 - Dashrath S/o Balmukund Aged About 50 Years 4 - Panchram S/o Kishun Aged About 55 Years 5 - Ghanshyam S/o Gangaram Aged About 33 Years 6 - Chandan Lal S/o Sarha Ram Aged About 40 Years 7 - Ramji S/o Kunjram Aged About 58 Years All R/o Village Lakhram, Police Station Ratanpur, Civil And Revenue District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 8 - Chotelal S/o Manohar Lal Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Lakhram Police Station Ratanpur, Civil And Revenue District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., ---- Respondents _____________________________________________________________ For Appellant :None For Respondents No.1 to 7 :Shri Shaishav Shekhar, Advocate appears on behalf of Shri Goutam Khetrapal, Advocate For Respondent No.8. :None, though served. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUNITA GOSWAMI Digitally signed by SUNITA GOSWAMI Date: 2025.07.14 17:50:21 +0530 2 Single Bench:Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal Order On Board 14.07.2025 1. No one appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the appellant, even when the case is called in the second round of hearing. 2. In the above circumstances, in absence of any representation, this Court is left with no other option, but to dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal) JUDGE sunita