IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90785 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-52 Year-2024 Thana- VAINI District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1. Dhaneshwar Sah Son of Rambali Sah Resident of Ward no. 13, Khaira, Waini, P.S.- Vaini, District- Samastipur, Bihar. 2. Anil Sah @ Anil Kumar Sah Son of Dhaneshwar Sah Resident of Ward no. 13, Khaira, Waini, P.S.- Vaini, District- Samastipur, Bihar. 3. Vikas Kumar @ Vikram Son of Dhaneshwar Sah Resident of Ward no. 13, Khaira, Waini P.S.- Vaini, District- Samastipur, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Keshav Bhardwaj For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 4 27-02-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to make necessary correction in the bail petition. 3. The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with Waini P.S. Case No. 52 of 2024 registered for offences under Sections 89, 109(1), 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 74, 303(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 4. At the very outset, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during the pendency of this case, the petitioner no. 1, Dhaneshwar Sah has been arrested, therefore he Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90785 of 2025(4) dt.27-02-2026 2/3 seeks permission to withdraw the present application filed on behalf of the petitioner no. 1, Dhaneshwar Sah. 5. Permission, as prayed, is granted. 6. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn filed on behalf of the petitioner no. 1. 7. Now the application is limited to the petitioner no. 2 and 3 only. 8. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners are accused of causing simple injuries to the victims. 9. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are quite innocent and have not committed any offence. He further submits that there is a delay of 26 days in lodging the FIR. 10. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail. 11. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this application for anticipatory bail is allowed. 12. Accordingly, let the petitioner nos. 2 and 3, above- named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from today in the Court below, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90785 of 2025(4) dt.27-02-2026 3/3 the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Waini P.S. Case No. 52 of 2024 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. Shishir/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T