KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION v. RUKMINI
MFA/3538/2021 · 2025-04-28
Lalitha Kanneganti
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21358 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21358 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:17728 MFA No. 3538 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 3538 OF 2021 (MV-D) BETWEEN:
KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, BANGALORE DIVISION, K.R.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 027.
BY ITS DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF LAW OFFICER. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. RENUKA H.R, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. RUKMINI, W/O LATE H.C. RAMANNA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
2. CHANDRASHEKAR S/O LATE H.C. RAMANNA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
3.
RAVIKUMAR H.R, S/O LATE H.C. RAMANNA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
4.
SHANKAR H.R, S/O LATE H.C. RAMANNA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:17728 MFA No. 3538 of 2021
5.
MANJUNATH H.R, S/O LATE H.C. RAMANNA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS
RESPONDENTS 1 TO 5 ARE RESIDING AT D NO. 166, P.HOSAHALLI VILLAGE, BELAGOLA HOBLI, SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 438. …RESPONDENTS (R1 RUKMINI - SERVED; R2 CHANDRASHEKAR - SERVED; R3 - RAVIKUMAR H.R - SERVED; R4 SHANKAR H.R - SERVED; R5 MANJUNATH H.R - SERVED BUT UNREPRESENTED )
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 31.01.2020 PASSED IN MVC NO. 977/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE JUDGE, ADDITIONAL COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, AS A PRESIDING OFFICER, AS A PRESIDING OFFICER, MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, MYSURU, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS. 5,56,000/- WITH INTEREST AT 6 PERCENT P.A. FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL ITS REALIZATION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:17728 MFA No. 3538 of 2021
ORAL JUDGMENT
A memo is filed seeking permission to withdraw the appeal. Memo is taken on file.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
All I.As. in this appeal shall stand closed.
SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
KA List No.: 4 Sl No.: 34 CT: BHK