Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21358 (JHR)

DEBRAJ SARKAR ALIAS NEMUA ALIAS DEVRAJ SARKAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./7203/2025 · 2025-08-08

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:23001 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 7203 of 2025 ------ Debraj Sarkar @ Nemua @ Devraj Sarkar, Aged about 43 years, Son of Meghnath Sarkar, Resident of Village –Nandipara, Post Office –Pakur, Police Station –Pakur (T), District –Pakur. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opp. Party ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. R.R.S. Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Subodh Kr. Dubey, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 08.08.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Pakur (T) P.S. Case No.317 of 2024 subsequently S.T. No. 69 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 109/3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and under Section 27 of the Arms Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this is the second journey of the petitioner with the prayer for regular bail and earlier the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 16.06.2025 in B.A. No. 4173 of 2025. It is next submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the fresh ground is that some relevant material could not be placed by the earlier counsel before this Court and some erroneous submission was made. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. on the other hand vehemently opposes the prayer for bail and submits that as such there is absolutely no fresh ground to review the earlier order dated 16.06.2025 passed in B.A. No. 4173 of 2025 by which the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected. Hence it is submitted that there being no fresh ground, the prayer for bail of the petitioner be rejected. Having heard the submissions made at the Bar and after going through the materials in the record, this Court find that there is absolutely no material in the record to show that there is any fresh ground to reconsider the prayer of the petitioner to be released on bail after rejection of his earlier bail application vide order dated 16.06.2025 in B.A. No. 4173 of 2025. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the above-named petitioner is rejected for the same reasons as mentioned in the order dated 16.06.2025 in B.A. No. 4173 of 2025. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu/Gunjan-